کورد، ایران و تاریخ

Philosophers such as Hegel and Jaspers, with different concepts, consider the millennium BC as the beginning of the era of real history or axial period of history. In their view, the true history of humanity begins in this period and everything before that belongs to prehistoric times. For this reason, this period is introduced as a transition from Pre-civilization to civilization, nature to culture (Philosophy and religions), and it is called evolution and progression. However, they have no answer to what caused this transformation or evolution. What is the thoughtless domain of thoughtful history? Was history action or reaction? If it was a reaction, what was the reaction against? The purpose of this article is to critique this theory and to show that the millennium BC was not only evolution and progression but also a rupture and retreat and also history was not action but reaction. History refers to the emergence of the soul in the form of religion and philosophy, both of which, on one hand, were reactions due to hatred or ignorance, on the other hand, were because of political competition. It means, philosophy in Plato was the ideology of class domination that he called democracy as the government of the ignorant as well as religion in Zoroastrianism was the ideology of ethnic domination.

Cyrus is the king whose history has become poetry. The narrations presented about him and his performance are not compatible with the personality of the ruler who has spent all his life engaged in the seizure of other countries. But where have the roots of these narratives originated from in which Cyrus and the entire Persians empire have been interpreted in terms of kindness and instead of plunder, have been marked with the scientific and historical badge? Why did such an aggressive person become known as a savior? The objective of this essay is to discuss how was the story of Cyrus' human rights constructed.

Dr.Zakaria (Heresh) Qaderi